Go to MPEP - Table of Contents
2173.03 Inconsistency Between Claim *>and< Specification Disclosure or Prior Art [R-1] - 2100 Patentability
2173.03 Inconsistency Between Claim *>and< Specification Disclosure or Prior Art [R-1]
Although the terms of a claim may appear to be definite, inconsistency with the specification disclosure or prior art teachings may make an otherwise definite claim take on an unreasonable degree of uncertainty. In re Cohn, 438 F.2d 989, 169 USPQ 95 (CCPA 1971); In re Hammack, 427 F.2d 1378, 166 USPQ 204 (CCPA 1970). In Cohn, the claim was directed to a process of treating a surface with a corroding solution until the metallic appearance is supplanted by an "opaque" appearance. Noting that no claim may be read apart from and independent of the supporting disclosure on which it is based, the court found that the description, definitions and examples set forth in the specification relating to the appearance of the surface after treatment were inherently inconsistent and rendered the claim indefinite.
Go to MPEP - Table of Contents