Go to MPEP - Table of Contents

Notice regarding Section 508 of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998. Section 508 of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 requires all United States Federal Agencies with websites to make them accessible to individuals with disabilities. At this time, the MPEP [HTML] files below do not meet all standards for web accessibility. Until changes can be made to make them fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, the USPTO is providing access assistance via telephone. MPEP Interim Accessibility Contact: 703-305-8813.

browse before

2267 Handling of Inappropriate or Untimely Filed Papers [R-2] - 2200 Citation of Prior Art and Ex Parte Reexamination of Patents

2267 Handling of Inappropriate or Untimely Filed Papers [R-2]

The applicable regulations ( 37 CFR 1.501(a), 1.550(e)) provide that certain types of correspondence will not be considered or acknowledged unless timely received. ** >Whenever reexamination correspondence is received, a decision is required of the Office as to the action to be taken on the correspondence based on what type of paper it is and whether it is timely.<

The return of inappropriate submissions complies with the regulations that certain papers will not be considered and also reduces the amount of paper which would ultimately have to be stored with the patent file.

>

I.    < DISPOSITION OF PAPERS

Where papers are filed during reexamination proceedings which are inappropriate because of some defect, such papers will either be returned to the sender or forwarded to one of three files, the "Reexamination File," the "Patent File," or the "Storage File." Any papers returned to the sender from a Technology Center (TC) must be accompanied by a letter indicating signature and approval of the TC Director.

The "Reexamination File" and the "Patent File" will remain together in a central storage area prior to the examiner taking up the case for a determination on whether to reexamine. After the files have been forwarded to the examiner for the determination, the "Patent File" will be maintained in the assigned examiner' s room until the reexamination proceeding is terminated.

The "Storage Files" will be maintained separate and apart from the other two files at a location selected by the TC Director. For example, the TC Director may want to locate the "Storage File" in a central area in the TC as with the reexamination clerk or in his or her room.

>

II.    < TYPES OF PAPERS RETURNED WITH * >DIRECTOR OF THE USPTO< OR TC DIRECTOR'S APPROVAL REQUIRED

Filed by Owner	A. Premature Response by Owner-
§ 1.530 (a), § 1.540	Where the patent owner is NOT the requester, any response or amendment filed by owner prior to an order to reexamine is premature and will be returned and will not be considered.
§ 1.550 (g)	B. Paper Submitted on Behalf of Third Party -
	Submission filed on behalf of a third party will be returned and will not be considered. Where third party paper is submitted as part of a patent owner response, see MPEP § 2254 and § 2266 .

Filed by Requester	A. No Statement Filed by Owner -
§ 1.535	If a patent owner fails to file a statement within the prescribed limit, any reply by the requester is inappropriate and will be returned and will not be considered.
	B. Late Response by Requester -
§ 1.535 , § 1.540	Any response subsequent to 2 months from the date of service of the patent owner's statement will be returned and will not be considered.
	C. Additional Response by Requester-
§ 1.550 (g)	The active participation of the reexamination requester ends with the reply pursuant to § 1.535 . Any further submission on behalf of requester will be returned and will not be considered.

Filed by Third Party
§ 1.501 , § 1.565 (a)	Unless a paper submitted by a third party raises only issues appropriate under 37 CFR 1.501 , or consists solely of a prior decision on the patent by another forum, e.g., a court (see MPEP § 2207 and § 2286 * > or presentation of a paper of record in a litigation (see MPEP § 2282 ) < ), it will be returned to an identified third party or destroyed if the submitter is unidentified.

>

III.    < TYPES OF DEFECTIVE PAPERS TO BE LOCATED IN THE "REEXAMINATION FILE"

Filed by Owner	A. Unsigned Papers -
§ 1.33	Papers filed by owner which are unsigned or signed by less than all of the owners (no attorney of record or acting in representative capacity).
	B. No Proof of Service -
§ 1.248	Papers filed by the patent owner in which no proof of service on requester is included and proof of service is required may be denied consideration.
	C. Untimely Papers -
§ 1.530 (b), § 1.540	Where owner has filed a paper which is untimely, that is, it was filed after the period set for response, the paper will not be considered.

Filed by Requester	A. Unsigned Papers -
	Papers filed by requester which are unsigned will not be considered.
	B. No Proof of Service -
§ 1.510 (b)(5)§ 1.33 , § 1.248	Papers filed by requester in which no proof of service on owner is included and where proof of service is required may be denied consideration.

>

IV.    < PAPERS LOCATED IN THE "STORAGE FILE"

§ 1.501	Citations by Third Parties
§ 1.550 (h)	Submissions by third parties based solely on prior art patents or publications filed after the date of the order to reexamine are not entered into the patent file but delayed until the reexamination proceedings have been terminated. > See MPEP § 2206 . <

Proper timely filed citations by third parties (i.e., filed prior to the order) are placed in the **>reexamination file<.

browse after