Go to MPEP - Table of Contents
> 706.02(f)(2) < * Provisional Rejections Under 35 U.S.C. 102(e); Reference Is a Copending U.S. Patent Application [R-1] - 700 Examination of Applications
>706.02(f)(2) < * Provisional Rejections Under 35 U.S.C. 102(e); Reference Is a Copending U.S. Patent Application [R-1]
If ** >an earlier filed, copending, and unpublished< U.S. patent application discloses subject matter which would anticipate the claims in *>a later filed< pending U.S. application which has a different inventive entity, the examiner should determine whether a provisional 35 U.S.C. 102(e) rejection >of the later filed application< can be made.>In addition, a provisional 35 U.S.C. 102(e) rejection may be made, in the circumstances described below, if the earlier filed, pending application has been published as redacted ( 37 CFR 1.217) and the subject matter relied upon in the rejection is not supported in the redacted publication of the patent application.<
I. COPENDING U.S. APPLICATIONS HAVING AT LEAST ONE COMMON INVENTOR OR ARE COMMONLY ASSIGNED
If (1) at least one common inventor exists between the applications or the applications are commonly assigned and (2) the effective filing dates are different, then a provisional rejection of the later filed application should be made. The provisional rejection is appropriate in circumstances where if the earlier filed application is published or becomes a patent it would constitute actual prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102. Since *>the earlier-filed< application is >not< published at the time of the * rejection, the rejection must be >provisionally< made under 35 U.S.C. 102(e).
A provisional rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) can be overcome in the same manner that a 35 U.S.C. 102(e) rejection can be overcome. See MPEP § 706.02(b). The provisional rejection can also be overcome by abandoning the applications and filing a new application containing the subject matter of both.
Form paragraph 7.15.01 ** should be used ** when making a provisional rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(e).
¶ 7.15.01 Provisional Rejection, 35 U.S.C. 102(e) - Common Assignee or At Least One Common Inventor
Claim [1] provisionally rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as being anticipated by copending Application No. [2] which has a common [3] with the instant application.
Based upon the earlier effective U.S. filing date of the copending application, it would constitute prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(e), if patented. This provisional rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) is based upon a presumption of future patenting of the copending application. [4].
This provisional rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) might be overcome either by a showing under 37 CFR 1.132 that any invention disclosed but not claimed in the copending application was derived from the inventor of this application and is thus not the invention "by another," or by an appropriate showing under 37 CFR 1.131.
This rejection may not be overcome by the filing of a terminal disclaimer. See In re Bartfeld, 925 F.2d 1450, 17 USPQ2d 1885 (Fed. Cir. 1991).
Examiner Note
1. This form paragraph is used to provisionally reject over a copending application with an earlier filing date that discloses the claimed invention. The copending application must have either a common assignee or at least one common inventor.
2. If the claims are obvious over the invention disclosed in the other copending application, use form paragraph 7.21.01.
3. In bracket 3, insert either --assignee-- or --inventor--.
4. In bracket 4, an appropriate explanation may be provided in support of the examiner's position on anticipation, if necessary.
5. If the claims of the copending application conflict with the claims of the instant application, a provisional double patenting rejection should also be given using form paragraphs 8.30 and 8.32.
6. If evidence is additionally of record to show that either invention is prior art unto the other under 35 U.S.C. 102(f) or (g), a rejection using form paragraphs 7.13 and/or 7.14 should also be made.
II. COPENDING APPLICATIONS HAVING NO COMMON INVENTOR OR ASSIGNEE
If there is no common assignee or common inventor and the application was not published pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 122(b), the confidential status of applications under 35 U.S.C. 122(a) must be maintained and no rejection can be made relying on the earlier filed >, unpublished< application >, or subject matter not supported in a redacted application publication,< as prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(e). If the filing dates of the applications are within 6 months of each other (3 months for simple subject matter) then interference may be proper. See MPEP Chapter 2300. If the application with the earliest effective U.S. filing date will not be published pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 122(b), it must be allowed to issue once all the statutory requirements are met. After the patent is published, it may be used as a reference in a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) in the still pending application as appropriate. See MPEP § 706.02(a) and § 2136 et seq.
Go to MPEP - Table of Contents